Founder mode is neither good nor bad. Hustle is neither noble nor toxic. The real question is simpler and harder. Is the urgency coming from the needs of the business, or from the wiring of the founder? I see this constantly. Founders who built successful companies and cannot break through the next level of growth. Not because they stopped working hard, but because they never stopped working the same way.
Read MoreEntrepreneurs who build traction almost always skew urgent. That urgency is often what gets the company off the ground in the first place. At scale, that same instinct becomes disruptive. People struggle to understand priorities. Context switches constantly. Everything sounds like a crisis. Leaders start mistaking urgency for accountability and patience for disengagement. So founders hire someone to "balance" them. Often a COO, Chief of Staff, or operations leader who skews more patient. In theory, it's a purposeful pairing. In practice, it creates conflict.
Read MoreStrong cultures don't eliminate toxicity entirely. They detect it early and contain it fast. They have antibodies: clear values, frequent feedback, leaders who stay engaged even under pressure. The goal isn't perfection. It's resilience. Whether a single bad apple spoils the barrel is one of the clearest indicators of leadership quality
Read MoreMany leaders do the same thing with every hard decision. If you’re waiting for the right time, you’ll never act. There is no perfect information. There is no risk-free moment. There is no version of this that doesn’t require courage. Make the decision. Or don’t. But stop pretending indecision is neutral.
Read MoreMost leaders don't call themselves perfectionists. They say they're being thorough. Setting the bar high. Still working to get it right. That's not always what's happening. Perfectionism rises as uncertainty rises. When leaders feel watched, judged, or exposed, perfection becomes the shield they grab.
Read MoreWhen you waffle, you're not avoiding a choice. You're making one. You're choosing to stay stuck. You're choosing to slow your team. You're choosing to let opportunities expire. Most of the time, the facts that informed your original decision haven't changed. Only your emotions have. Make the decision or don't. Stop pretending indecision is neutral.
Research shows that when we see ourselves clearly, we’re more confident, more creative, and better decision-makers. We build stronger relationships, communicate more effectively, and lead more satisfied, higher-performing teams. Yet most leaders overestimate their self-awareness dramatically. Yet most leaders overestimate their self-awareness dramatically. In one study, 95% of people believed they were self-aware — but only 10 to 15% actually were.
Read MoreWhen uncertainty hits, employees want answers. If they don’t get them, they’ll make up their own. Usually jumping to the worst-case scenario in the process. That speculation erodes trust and compounds anxiety.
Read MoreOne-on-ones aren't optional. They're not nice-to-haves. They're the most important meetings on your calendar. The leaders who master one-on-ones don’t just have happier teams. They have better results.
Read MoreBeing detail-oriented is often what gets you promoted. It’s how you earn trust, build credibility, and prove you can deliver. But once you step into a true leadership seat, especially at the executive level, those same instincts can become your biggest liability.
Read MoreMost leaders hate meetings because they still think their real work is somewhere else. It’s not. The meeting is the work. It’s where coaching happens. Where friction gets surfaced and conflicts resolved. Where your values show up. If you’re phoning it in or constantly rescheduling, that’s the signal you’re sending to everyone else. You don’t have to love meetings. But you do have to learn how to lead inside them
Read MoreYou can’t fire Cal. He’s indispensable.” That’s what the Board told me on my first day as CEO. Cal was their lead engineer. He had decades of experience, deep technical knowledge, and a reputation for terrorizing anyone who dared disagree with him.
Read MoreMuch of the tech talk recently is about AI, specifically ChatGPT (generating text) and Lensa AI (generating images). So, I gave ChatGPT a request to write an article on how a CEO's ethics impacts the culture of the organization. While it lacks my charm and occasional snark, nor does it include the storytelling I often do, can you tell that it was machine-generated?
Read MoreHow many times have you been in an interview process when someone asks the question: “Will they fit in here?” Is there an objective way to answer that? The question of fit is based on careful business choices. It’s based on emotion, and we all know hiring isn’t a decision we should make emotionally. And yet…so many business leaders do.
Read More94% of senior executives think it’s important to focus on the growth and development of their HR executives so they’re ready to face the future. Of course, if you don’t have an HR executive on your team, you can’t focus on developing them. That’s the time to begin thinking about hiring a Chief People Officer.
Read MoreAn interim executive temporarily takes a management position in an organization to help the existing leadership solve problems and set the future, permanent leader up for success. Knowing whether an interim executive is right for your organization depends on your current needs and your assumptions about the future.
Read MoreThey do the performance development, and nothing changes. Why? Because a change in behavior requires practice, reinforcement, repetition. If leaders want to see real change when they implement performance development initiatives, they need to follow the three Cs of good management: Clarity, Communication, and Consistency.
Read MoreOne of the most frequent struggles I see with entrepreneurs and business owners is this tension between managing the day-to-day operations of the organization and focusing on overarching strategy. Many business owners who seek coaching or peer advisory boards know they’re not spending enough time on strategy, and they can’t figure out how to shift the balance.
Read MoreYou might think that since companies spend upwards of $2 trillion every year on acquisitions, they’re a sure thing. The truth is, mergers and acquisitions fail at a rate of 70-90%. The biggest hurdle companies face after a merger or acquisition is the integration of teams. Few take the time and give the focus needed to build cohesive teams.
Read MoreWhat do you do when you need to make an organizational change or let an employee down and you want to maintain a successful employer-employee relationship? For each situation, the first step is being willing to have difficult conversations with your employees.
Read MoreStartups and Small Businesses sometimes find themselves at the edge of a chasm. With success in developing and growing their business, a stage is reached where they find that the "next step" is a big one! Trajectify partners with the entrepreneur to build momentum and trajectory to be able to cross the chasm.
We offer private and group (Mastermind) coaching and hold frequent events and seminars.
Trajectify is founded my Mike Krupit, veteran of eight startups. Mike has helped dozens of companies grow and mentored and advised hundreds more.
Ask a room of leaders why they set goals and most will say accountability. That answer creates the problem. Goals exist for alignment. The company needs to reach a number, so this group does this, that group does that, and together the math works. Everyone is pointed in the same direction. Focus comes second. A good goal tells you what to say no to.
The instinct to build a team that moved in the same direction, at the same pace, with the same set of perspectives is limiting. Consistency is created at the expense of range. The goal isn't alignment of strengths. It's coverage. The most dangerous teams I've seen weren't the ones with conflict. hey were the ones with none. Where every conversation ends in agreement. Where nothing gets surfaced. Where the people who see things differently may have learned to stop saying so.
The same restlessness that makes it hard to stay on plan is what made them start the company in the first place. The wandering mind, the refusal to be satisfied with what already exists, the ability to see something before it exists: that's not a disorder. That's the source.
If you're building a company, knowing your role isn't optional. The visionary needs someone who will build what they see without getting in the way of the seeing. The integrator needs someone who will point at the moon and mean it and keep pointing at the same moon long enough for the bridge to get built. The mistake I see most often: trying to be both or hiring someone who mirrors you when you need someone who complements you.
The fear of success doesn't usually announce itself as fear. It sounds like planning. It sounds like due diligence. It sounds like being responsible.
What it actually is: A limiting belief. It’s spending today's energy on problems you'll only face if you win
Right people, right seats doesn't mean everyone eventually moves into a leadership role. It means finding the seat where each person does their best work and building a structure that makes those seats worth staying in. Create a path for people who want to grow as individual contributors. Create a separate path for people who want to lead. Reward both. Respect both. Pay both.
Don't prevent scraped knees; prevent bus crashes. A scraped knee hurts. You might carry the scar for years. That's the point. The pain is proportional to the lesson. A bus crash can lead to catastrophic loss. The project. The company. The relationship. Something that can't be recovered. The leader's job isn't to eliminate mistakes. It's to know the difference between those two things.
TEAM | INTERIM EXECS | COACHING | PEER ADVISORY | SERVICES | RESOURCES | CAREERS | CONTACT
Copyright 2026, Trajectify LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Sometimes exploration is worth it. Sometimes you just spent a week of the team’s attention answering a question the founder could have tested in an afternoon. That is the part I think leaders underestimate. Ideas do not only cost money. They cost time, focus, and brainpower long before anyone approves a budget. The question I’d want answered is: how much of the organization does this idea deserve yet?